The Bizarre Idea of "Male Aggression" as an explanation for political forms of violence
Richard A. Koenigsberg
Nations Have the Right to Kill
 

For information on purchasing the e-book at a special, discount rate, click here.

ARTICULATING A REVOLUTION IN HUMAN THOUGHT

And let's get rid of the idea, once and for all, of "male aggression"  as an explanation of political forms of violence.

It's clear from what I've written below that human forms of (collective) violence always are performed in the name of sacred ideal, Human violence is a strange form of spirituality. Hitler: "We may be inhumane, but if we rescue Germany we have performed the greatest deed in the world." 

Political violence is undertaken in the name of rescuing one's nation, or any sacred ideal--such as communism or "the people."

The idea that human violence (on a monumental scale--200 million people killed in the 20th century( originates in a bunch of "naked apes" gone berserk...is one of the silliest ideas that has come out of academia.

We didn't used to know this very well: that absurd ideas can gain credence and dominance within culture. Donald Trump has performed a service--showing that this can happen; how it happened. 
_______________________________________________________________________________________

A nation is a body politic, a projection of one’s own body. The nation (unlike actual organisms) is conceived as omnipotent, indeed immortal. Human being seek to fuse with their nations—become “one” with them—in the hope of achieving an omnipotent, immortal body.

Nationalism is relocation of the self: from one’s own body to a body politic. One imagines one exists “out there”—participating in world historic events.

Nations can’t live without enemies. Nations come into being by identifying an enemy against which a struggle can be waged. One may call this enemy a Jew or a communist or a terrorist—it doesn’t matter—if there is an object or class of people against which a struggle can be waged.

What distinguishes nations from other social entities or institutions is that they have the right to kill. A cursory study of history reveals that killing is what nations do best.

A nation’s enemy may be outside of its boundaries, or inside. In either case, the enemy is identified as the source of evil: cause of the nation’s misfortune.

At the core of nationalism lies a rescue fantasy: one’s people are suffering. To relieve the suffering of one’s nation—one must identify an enemy: the source or cause of suffering.

National violence revolves around killing the source of suffering: that object or entity or class of people that is imagined to be depriving the nation of its proper place in the sun. National violence, however brutal or extensive, always is performed in the name of virtue. Killing is a manifestation of morality.

Hitler declared, “We may be inhumane, but if we rescue Germany—we have performed the greatest deed in the world.” Hitler often is conceived as an anomaly or outsider. However, the statement above reveals the fundamental template governing national violence. Inhumane acts are performed in the name of—for the purpose of—rescuing one’s beloved country.