A comment or addendum on
the Newsletter that appears below.
Once one understands the SYMBOLIC nature of politics, things are not so difficult to understand. It's not that people want "real" things. Large chunks of "territory?" What is one going to do with all that territory? Historians live in a "world taken for granted." They don't interrogate their own assumptions. They live with the collective dream they have agreed upon.
Nations have symbolic meaning, which accounts for most of what happens between them (war and genocide). Germany was Hitler's "motherland." He was born in Austria, and identified himself with Austria (and Germany). He wanted to return to the Mother, a gigantic, symbolic Mother, thus Hitler blew himself up, becoming "bigger."
Same dynamic with Putin. He wants UKRAINE to "return to the Russian Motherland." For what (real) purpose? No purpose. What is he going to do with all that land or territory? With all those people? The little man feels or becomes "bigger." He blows himself up. And everyone pays attention. It's all symbolic. Full of sound and fury.
And the historians take these fantasies so seriously (and of course the fantasies that these men enact have very serious consequences (a matter of life and death). However, the motivations are full of sound and fury, signifying nothing real.
It's not valuable to compose monumental histories if you don't know the ROOTS OF ACTION. Timothy Snyder has hundreds of "likes" on Amazon for the books he's written. But does he have a clue regarding the root causes of the "facts" and events he write about?
Donald Trump had millions of "likes." The fact that people "like" something doesn't make something true.
In fact, more likely if people DO NOT LIKE SOMETHING, is is more likely to be valuable and true. Think Darwin and Freud.
Richard Koenigsberg
|