Beginning to awaken

It would appear scholars and students are beginning to "catch on" to Koenigsberg's disturbing interpretations of culture and the historical process. We are appreciative. Below is a note from a regular reader of our Newsletter. If any of you receiving and reading the LSS Newsletter would like to write a commentary on any recent Newsletter, please write to Mei Ha Chan at bookexhibits@Libraryofsocialscience.com. 

We thank you for the fact that you've continued to read these missives. We know the that ideas are not pleasant. However, some of us still value and honor the fundamental objective of scholarly work: the pursuit of truth.

Best regards,
Andrew C. Hammer
Executive Director
Library of Social Science

PS: This is the last Newsletter today, September 26, 2023. Thanks for sticking with us. Relax, have a pleasant evening, and be inspired by this wonderful song and performance by Mariah Carey. 

__________________________________________________________________

From Timothy K. Bartlett
Subject: Re: Warfare as verification

It’s brilliant, and nauseating in its obviousness and in the immediateness of the sense it makes.  The sense of visceral horror generated by even considering the truth of this line of reasoning evokes Kafka’s old chestnut that the sign that one is awakening is a desire to die.  If the truth is this horrible, then we must all be baptized in horror to awaken. 

In either case, I score another point for Il Maestro and you may count me among the numbers of those who are “awakening from the nightmare of history.”  I hope that you’re wrong but fear most vividly that you are right and as such stand ready, if terrified, to accept the awful truth of it if you are.

Sadly, and sincerely yours, Tim
___________________________________________________________________

"Does it matter to which country the bodies--dead on the field of battle--belong? What is significant is the presence of mutilated human beings. Dead and mutilated bodies are generated in the name of verification. We find it inconceivable that monumental death, destruction and suffering are waged in the name of no thing. People must be dying in the name of something."

The goal of war is death

If people die, wars are successful. "History" is the generation of death in the name of a sacred ideal. That which we die for varies, but in our hearts the dream remains the same.

We may believe the cause is evil; we may believe the cause is virtuous: Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Mao--and yes Abraham Lincoln--all used the same methodology: killing to prove the truth and reality of one's ideology.

If many people die in the name of an Ideology, it must be real. Nazism, Communism--and "saving the Union"--became real by virtue of the number of deaths generated. There is a linear relationships: the greater the number of deaths, the greater the reality. Warfare represents a method of VERIFICATION. 

From Paul H. Kahn, Sacred Violence

“The battlefield is strewn with the disemboweled and beheaded, with severed limbs and broken bodies. All have died a terrible death in a display of sovereign power. Viewing the battlefield from a certain distance, it is not even clear who is the object of sacrifice: the enemy and the conscript suffer the same threat and burden of physical destruction for the sake of making present sovereign power.”

Dead soldiers on a World War I battlefield.