It's really not necessary for me to comment on the absurd statements
made by Niall Ferguson below--men fought in the First World War because it was "fun."
Nine million died in the First World War and the accompanying photos
and descriptions of the experiences of soldiers--tell the story. Why would someone
make such a bizarre statement? I have no idea.
Part of the disintegration of academia, where lying and refusing to encounter
truth seems to be a trend (along with the firing of high-status professors).
The scholars who write for my Newsletter are held to higher standards.
But some academics, apparently, feel it's more advantageous to make
a lot of noise and get people to read one's blogs or watch one's video. Perhaps they embrace the view,
"What's truth got to do with it" (Tina Turner).
Richard Koenigsberg
PS: And the fantastic notion that an idea which is "liked" is a superior idea. Everyone nowadays
is in the quest for "likes." No problem if we're in the domain of music.
But most of the great ideas proposed in history (which eventually became the most important ideas)
were those that were NOT LIKED.
Richard Koenigsberg on Niall Ferguson's view of the First World War
|